People now have to leave their houses while the
People now have to leave their houses while the gas is sprayed and wait for it to be gone to return. The cost will also be a matter of much contention because the fumigation will run between $1000 and $2000, as opposed to the older treatment which was substantially less than a thousand dollars. The EPA will not concede this point, though, as they claim that there are other suitable chemicals which will perform the same function and cost the same as the banned substance. The spokesman was also quick to point out that the threat of the powder post beetle is questionable since it can only cause aesthetic damage. Further resources about pest Control Services are located there.
Of pracically the same expense as the chemical which was banned, a substitute called pentachlorophenol which is both approved and effective in the control of the powder post beetle has been brought out by the EPA. For this reason, the agency believes that there is no reason for the American consumer to worry about cost increases. Even the company who prduced the banned chemical and some members of the pest control association are in agreement with the findings of the EPA. The source of the testimony was a set of hearings conducted by the EPA about potentially halting use of the chemical and whether or not to outright ban it.
Tags: aesthetic damage, fumigation, further resources, pentachlorophenol, pest control association, pest control services